Ascitic fluid polymorphic nuclear cell count impacts on outcome of cirrhotic patients with ascites

6Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is defined as an ascitic polymorphonuclear cell count (A-PMN) > 250 cells/µl. Objective: We aimed to investigate the prognostic value of ascitic fluid cell counts in patients without SBP. Patients and methods: A total of 178 patients were included and stratified by ascitic cell counts at index paracentesis: A-LEUK-low (<250/µl), A-LEUK-intermediate (250–500/µl) and A-LEUK-SBP (>500/µl) for leukocytes; A-PMN-low (<125/µl), A-PMN-intermediate (125–250/µl) and A-PMN-SBP (>250/µl) for PMN cells. Results: One-year mortality was comparable between group A-LEUK-SBP (53.9%) and patients with subclinical cell counts (34.5% for A-LEUK-low, 43.5% for A-LEUK-intermediate, log-rank p = 0.547). However, we observed an increase in one-year mortality already in group A-PMN-intermediate with 75% and A-PMN-SBP with 80.9% (vs 40.5% for A-PMN-low, log-rank p = 0.016). Importantly, increases of A-PMN cell counts between two paracenteses were associated with increased mortality: per 100 cells/µl increase of absolute A-PMN cell count: hazard ratio (HR): 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–1.06), p = 0.005; per 5% increase of relative PMN cell count: HR: 1.15 (95% CI: 1.06–1.26), p = 0.001. Conclusion: Patients with PMN cell counts of 125–250/µl are at high risk for mortality, which was very similar to SBP patients with PMN cell counts >250/µl. This highlights the need for preventive strategies. The prognostic value of changes in relative ascitic PMN cell counts should be evaluated in future studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Simbrunner, B., Röthenbacher, A., Haslacher, H., Bauer, D., Chromy, D., Bucsics, T., … Reiberger, T. (2019). Ascitic fluid polymorphic nuclear cell count impacts on outcome of cirrhotic patients with ascites. United European Gastroenterology Journal, 7(5), 651–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640619843000

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free