Equações específicas por sexo para estimativa do consumo máximo de oxigênio em cicloergometria

18Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Aerobic fitness, assessed by measuring VO2max in maximum cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) or by estimating VO2max through the use of equations in exercise testing, is a predictor of mortality. However, the error resulting from this estimate in a given individual can be high, affecting clinical decisions. Objective: To determine the error of estimate of VO2max in cycle ergometry in a population attending clinical exercise testing laboratories, and to propose sex-specific equations to minimize that error. Methods: This study assessed 1715 adults (18 to 91 years, 68% men) undertaking maximum CPX in a lower limbs cycle ergometer (LLCE) with ramp protocol. The percentage error (E%) between measured VO2max and that estimated from the modified ACSM equation (Lang et al. MSSE, 1992) was calculated. Then, estimation equations were developed: 1) for all the population tested (C-GENERAL); and 2) separately by sex (C-MEN and C-WOMEN). Results: Measured VO2max was higher in men than in WOMEN:-29.4 ± 10.5 and 24.2 ± 9.2 mL.(kg.min)-1(p < 0.01). The equations for estimating VO2max [in mL.(kg.min)-1] were: C-GENERAL = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.483 + 7; C-MEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 10.791 + 7; and C-WOMEN = [final workload (W)/body weight (kg)] x 9.820 + 7. The E% for MEN was:-3.4 ± 13.4% (modified ACSM); 1.2 ± 13.2% (C-GENERAL); and-0.9 ± 13.4% (C-MEN) (p < 0.01). For WOMEN:-14.7 ± 17.4% (modified ACSM);-6.3 ± 16.5% (C-GENERAL); and-1.7 ± 16.2% (C-WOMEN) (p < 0.01). Conclusion: The error of estimate of VO2max by use of sex-specific equations was reduced, but not eliminated, in exercise tests on LLCE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Souza E Silva, C. G., & De Araújo, C. G. S. (2015). Equações específicas por sexo para estimativa do consumo máximo de oxigênio em cicloergometria. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 105(4), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20150089

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free