Protection against enamel demineralisation using toothpastes containing o-cymen-5-ol, zinc chloride and sodium fluoride

11Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the ability of two experimental toothpastes containing 0.1%w/w o-cymen-5-ol, 0.6%w/w ZnCl2 and 0.320%w/w NaF to reduce demineralisation of sound human enamel compared with control toothpastes. Methods: Study 1: Specimens were treated with toothpaste slurries, followed by alternating periods in demineralising and neutral solutions. Demineralisation was assessed using surface microhardness (SMH). Study 2: Specimens were subjected to a 14 day cycling regime of alternating demineralisation / remineralisation with two toothpaste treatments per day, before and after demineralisation. Demineralisation was assessed by cross-sectional microhardness and mineral loss (ΔZ) was calculated. Test toothpastes were a) 0%w/w or 0.002%w/w NaF placebo, b) 0.055%w/w or 0.149%w/w NaF (dose response), c) 0.320%w/w NaF marketed product, d & e) 0.1%w/w o-cymen-5-ol, 0.6%w/w ZnCl2 and 0.320%w/w NaF (experimental toothpastes). Results: Study 1: Mean ± SE % of baseline hardness values were a) 48.0 ± 2.1 a, b) 66.7 ± 1.7b, c) 82.9 ± 1.9 c, d) 91.7 ± 1.4d and e) 94.6 ± 2.1 d. Study 2: Mean ± SE ΔZ values were a) 2114 ± 187a, b) 1206 ± 132b, c) 303 ± 89 c, d) 19 ± 73c, and e) -10 ± 55c. Letters represent different statistical groupings (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In study 1, both experimental toothpastes were statistically superior to the marketed product and in study 2; they were at least as effective as the marketed product at reducing caries lesion development. © 2011 FDI World Dental Federation.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Churchley, D., Newby, C. S., Willson, R., Haider, A., Schemehorn, B., & Lynch, R. J. M. (2011). Protection against enamel demineralisation using toothpastes containing o-cymen-5-ol, zinc chloride and sodium fluoride. International Dental Journal, 61(SUPPL. 3), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2011.00050.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free