Recently published papers: Therapies failed, disputed, and beneficent

1Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A recent meta-analysis puts another nail in the coffin of a therapy that held great promise for management of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Two papers further highlight the growing controversy surrounding the safety profile of drotrecogin alfa (activated) and increase the clamour for a new independent trial. Also covered are steroids and their role in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation, and success in instituting hypothermia after cardiac arrest. Finally, which form of renal replacement therapy should we be using in the intensive care unit? © 2007 BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams, G. (2007). Recently published papers: Therapies failed, disputed, and beneficent. Critical Care, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc5931

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free