Methodological and epistemological challenges in meme research and meme studies

16Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article examines some methodological and epistemological challenges facing meme studies and meme research. It delves into the shifts in Anglophone meme culture post-Trump and challenges the assumption that memes are generally anonymous and antagonistic by highlighting the coexistence of collegiality and pseudonymity across diverse meme communities. Moreover, it suggests that such meme cultures can transcend from online to offline realms, requiring methodological adaptations to capture this dual dimension of creativity and sociality. The paper also addresses epistemological challenges in meme studies, starting from memetics’ contentious history and critiquing the dominance of cultural evolutionary theory in contemporary meme research. It brings attention to the academic tendency to follow a “Dawkins to Shifman pipeline” citation trope in meme research and advocates for a more critical approach informed by platform studies. It argues that the future of meme studies lies at the intersection of platform ideology and content economies, urging scholars to engage with historical and political transformations in digital culture for a comprehensive understanding of memes and their societal impact.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Galip, I. (2024). Methodological and epistemological challenges in meme research and meme studies. Internet Histories, 8(4), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2024.2359846

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free