Abstract
Based on the experience of budget management reforms that have been introduced over the last two decades in a large number of member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) it is not uncommon to find emerging market economies moving toward performance-based budgeting where measures of performance play a key role. While it might be tempting for middle income countries to press forward to adopt a full-blown outputs and outcomes framework, there are some risks in the move. Such a change in orientation is only possible once managers have had adequate experience in refining the definition of programs and their objectives, and on this basis developing a comprehensive system of performance measurement. It is argued in this paper that to develop a comprehensive performance measurement system requires resolving a number of issues involved in clearly defining how to measure «performance» as well as overcoming a number of technical issues in the design and use of measures of that «performance». However, perhaps the most critical step is introducing a system whereby performance information can influence resource allocation decisions, i.e., establishing a performance management system. Based on international experience, this paper reviews each of these hurdles in moving toward a performance management framework.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Diamond, J. (2005). Establishing a Performance Management Framework for Government. IMF Working Papers, 05(50), 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451860696.001
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.