POS1040 SAFETY OF DEUCRAVACITINIB, AN ORAL, SELECTIVE TYROSINE KINASE 2 INHIBITOR: AS ASSESSED BY LABORATORY PARAMETERS – RESULTS FROM A PHASE 2 TRIAL IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS AND 2 PHASE 3 TRIALS IN PSORIASIS

  • Fleischmann R
  • Thaçi D
  • Gooderham M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Deucravacitinib (DEUC) is a novel, oral, selective, allosteric tyros‐ine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor with a unique mechanism of action distinct from Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2/3 inhibitors. DEUC mediates signalling of key cytokines in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and psoriasis (PsO). DEUC was well tolerated and efficacious vs placebo (PBO) in a Phase 2 trial in patients (pts) with PsA,1 and vs PBO or apremilast in 2 Phase 3 PsO trials.2 Objectives: To assess the effects of DEUC on multiple laboratory parameters through the frst 16 weeks of treatment (PBO‐controlled) in these trials. Methods: The Phase 2 double‐blind PsA trial randomised pts (n=203) 1:1:1 to PBO, DEUC 6 mg once daily (QD), or 12 mg QD. The Phase 3 double‐blind PsO trials, POETYK PSO‐1 and POETYK PSO‐2, randomised pts (n=666 and 1020, respectively) 1:2:1 to PBO, DEUC 6 mg QD, or apremilast 30 mg twice daily. Changes from baseline in haematologic (neutrophils, lymphocytes, platelets, haemoglobin) and chemistry (cholesterol, triglycerides, alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspar‐tate aminotransferase [AST], and creatine phosphokinase [CPK]) parameters were evaluated. Shifts in Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE; version 5.0) severity grade ≥3 of laboratory abnormalities were assessed. Results: In the PsA trial, 65% of pts were on concomitant conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) and 54.7% of pts were on methotrexate. The vast majority of pts continued to have laboratory parameters within normal range throughout the 3 trials in PsO and PsA. No clinically meaningful changes from baseline were observed in laboratory parameters in pts treated with DEUC, PBO, or apremilast. Rates of CTCAE grade 3 and 4 were rare (≤1 pt) and similar across DEUC‐, PBO‐, and apremilast‐treated pts for the following parameters: lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelets, haemoglobin, AST, ALT, and cholesterol (Table 1). Shifts to CTCAE grades ≥3 in triglycerides and CPK were infrequent and generally comparable across treatment arms. Conclusion: DEUC treatment did not result in clinically meaningful laboratory changes, abnormalities often seen with JAK 1/2/3 inhibition, through 16 weeks of treatment in a Phase 2 trial in PsA, despite two‐thirds of pts being on concomitant csDMARDs, and in 2 large Phase 3 trials in PsO.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fleischmann, R. M., Thaçi, D., Gooderham, M., Strober, B., Korman, N. J., Banerjee, S., … Mease, P. J. (2022). POS1040 SAFETY OF DEUCRAVACITINIB, AN ORAL, SELECTIVE TYROSINE KINASE 2 INHIBITOR: AS ASSESSED BY LABORATORY PARAMETERS – RESULTS FROM A PHASE 2 TRIAL IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS AND 2 PHASE 3 TRIALS IN PSORIASIS. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 81, 835–836. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.1862

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free