The Safety of Tiotropium — The FDA's Conclusions

  • Michele T
  • Pinheiro S
  • Iyasu S
99Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In any field, improving performance and accountability depends on having a shared goal that unites the interests and activities of all stakeholders. In health care, however, stakeholders have myriad, often conflicting goals, including access to services, profitability, high quality, cost containment, safety, convenience, patient-centeredness, and satisfaction. Lack of clarity about goals has led to divergent approaches, gaming of the system, and slow progress in performance improvement. Achieving high value for patients must become the overarching goal of health care delivery, with value defined as the health outcomes achieved per dollar spent.(1) This goal is what matters for patients and unites . . .

References Powered by Scopus

A 4-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

1982Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Inhaled anticholinergics and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

468Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease 2017 report

2487Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Disease: A clinical practice guideline update from the american college of physicians, american college of chest physicians, american thoracic society, and european respiratory society

908Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

865Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Michele, T. M., Pinheiro, S., & Iyasu, S. (2010). The Safety of Tiotropium — The FDA’s Conclusions. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(12), 1097–1099. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1008502

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

47%

Researcher 11

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

23%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 43

86%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

8%

Social Sciences 2

4%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

2%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 456

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free