Evaluation of various methods for recovering human norovirus and murine norovirus from vegetables and ham

19Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We evaluated and optimized each step in an analytical method for detecting norovirus from various foods. We characterized the buffers needed for eluting norovirus from foods such as ham and lettuce. Two different concentration methods, polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation and hollow fiber ultrafiltration (HUF), were compared using both murine norovirus (MNV) and human norovirus (HuNoV). For PEG precipitation, an elution buffer containing 3% beef extract (pH 7.1) was more suitable than 0.05 M glycine plus 0.14 M NaCl ((pH 7.5), and the recovery efficiency increased with increasing molecular weight of PEG. To determine the optimal buffer for concentrating norovirus by HUF, glycine buffers with different (pH values and ionic strengths were examined as elution buffers. Overall, HUF was more efficient for norovirus recovery than was PEG precipitation. Because there was a significant positive correlation between MNV and HuNoV results, MNV could be a useful surrogate for detecting HuNoV in foods. Copyright © International Association for Food Protection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, H., Kim, M., & Ko, G. (2010). Evaluation of various methods for recovering human norovirus and murine norovirus from vegetables and ham. Journal of Food Protection, 73(9), 1651–1657. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-73.9.1651

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free