Pain and functionality following sternotomy: A prospective 12-month observational study

12Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective. To document pain levels, functionality, and analgesic use in the 12 months following a sternotomy to identify factors associated with the development of persistent post-sternotomy pain. Design. Prospective observational study. Settings. Royal Hobart Hospital, Australia. Subjects. Patients undergoing a sternotomy between January and November 2013. Methods. One hundred and ten patients were recruited and followed for 12 months, with telephone calls at 10 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months. An initial survey was completed at the point of recruitment including patient history, depression and anxiety scales, self-rated health, and pain catastrophizing scale. Results. The mean age of participants was 69.6 years, with the majority of participants being male (84.5%). The proportion of patients reporting pain in the early post-discharge period was high, with 30% of patients experiencing on average moderate- severe pain in the 10 days following discharge and 11% experiencing on average moderate-severe pain at 6 weeks. At 12 months, 15.5% of participants reported on average mild pain and 0.9% an average of moderate-severe pain in the preceding week at their sternotomy site. Pain of neuropathic origin was reported by 41.2% of those with on average daily pain at 12 months. Conclusion: This study highlights the need for further research to investigate whether more intensive pain management in the post-discharge period following sternotomy as well as the early identification of patients with neuropathic pain symptoms can reduce the incidence of persistent post-operative pain at 12 months.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Veal, F. C., Bereznicki, L. R. E., Thompson, A. J., Peterson, G. M., & Orlikowski, C. E. (2016). Pain and functionality following sternotomy: A prospective 12-month observational study. Pain Medicine (United States), 17(6), 1155–1162. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnv066

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free