Controversies in CPT® coding in the neonatal intensive care unit: - critical vs. intensive care

9Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Professional reimbursement to neonatal providers is based on the level of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT®) coding in the NICU, newborn nursery and other areas where neonatal care is provided. Four levels of evaluation and management (E&M) care—critical, intensive, routine-hospital care or normal newborn care can be provided to neonates. The work relative value units (wRVUs) associated with these four levels of care vary widely. This manuscript provides a brief review of basic features associated with each of these four levels with a specific perspective on differences between critical and intensive care codes. Coding and billing are constantly evolving fields with significant variation in interpretation and readers are encouraged to review the current publications on CPT® coding and make an informed decision on the best codes to be used for their patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lakshminrusimha, S., Song, C., Pearlman, S. A., Martin, G., & Duncan, S. (2023). Controversies in CPT® coding in the neonatal intensive care unit: - critical vs. intensive care. Journal of Perinatology, 43(12), 1535–1540. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-023-01704-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free