Mandibular condylar fracture: a systematic review of systematic reviews and a proposed algorithm for management

30Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The choice of surgical or non-surgical treatment of mandibular condylar fractures remains controversial. Earlier trials documented multiple complications of surgical treatment and recommended a non-surgical approach, while more recent trials have shown superior outcomes of surgical compared with non-surgical treatment in some cases. In this paper we systematically review the systematic reviews on the topic that were published before January 2019 and which followed the PRISMA statement, and propose an algorithm for the management of these fractures. Two systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria of the current review, both of which showed better outcome from surgical than non-surgical treatment. We propose an algorithm based on the feasibility of fixation, ability to restore joint and occlusal function, and ensure adequate healing, and consider patient-associated factors that facilitate decision-making.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alyahya, A., Bin Ahmed, A., Nusair, Y., Ababtain, R., Alhussain, A., & Alshafei, A. (2020, July 1). Mandibular condylar fracture: a systematic review of systematic reviews and a proposed algorithm for management. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Churchill Livingstone. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.03.014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free