Discharge management strategies in German general hospitals: A nationwide survey of professionals responsible for clinical risk management

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Transitions from inpatient care are associated with risks for the safety of patients. In 2017, the framework agreement on discharge management was legally defined. There is currently a lack of empirical data in Germany on the implementation of measures to ensure safe transitions of patients after inpatient care. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the discharge management strategies implemented by German general hospitals. Methods: Between March and May 2022, specific discharge management strategies as well as structural and organizational characteristics were assessed in a nationwide survey of 401 general hospitals, and descriptive statistics and group comparisons were performed. Results: Seven of nine strategies surveyed were implemented in > 95% of all hospitals. The evaluation of discharge planning was only implemented in 61% of the hospitals, and systematic documentation, analysis, and evaluation of readmissions in 54%. Hospitals with a higher number of hospital beds reported significantly less often about “early contact with follow-up care providers” and “organization of a seamless transition to follow-up care.” Discussion: A large part of the strategies in discharge management from inpatient treatment is implemented in German general hospitals. However, measures for evaluation and the systematic analysis of discharge processes and readmissions of patients have only been partially implemented. However, these are necessary to systematically evaluate and potentially improve the discharge processes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marsall, M., Weigl, M., Schmiedhofer, M., Blum, K., Rösner, H., Strametz, R., & Gambashidze, N. (2024). Discharge management strategies in German general hospitals: A nationwide survey of professionals responsible for clinical risk management. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, 67(5), 587–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-024-03846-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free