Incidence risk of PD-1/PD-L1 related diarrhea in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

8Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: We designed the study to illustrate the OR of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor-related diarrhea in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Method: This systematic review and meta-analysis were put into practice according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Incidence of all grades for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-related diarrhea in NSCLC was taken into account. Results: After screening and eligibility assessment of 57 articles, a total of 12 clinical trials involving 6,659 participants were collected for the final meta-analysis. The incidence risk of diarrhea for all grades was lower in PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy compared to monochemotherapy of docetaxel (OR=0.31, 95% CI [0.24, 0.41]; I2=0%, Z=8.23 (p<0.00001)), while a similar result could also be seen in PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy group (OR=0.41, 95% CI [0.27, 0.64]; I2=59%, Z=3.92 [p<0.00001]). The opposite result can be seen when PD-1/PDL1 inhibitor combined chemotherapy was compared to chemotherapy alone (OR=1.51, 95% CI [1.22, 1.87]; I2=0%, Z=3.77 [p<0.00001]). Similar incidence trend could also be seen in the meta-analysis of diarrhea for grade 1-2 and grade 3-5. Conclusion: The incidence risk of diarrhea associated with PD-1/-PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy was significantly lower than that of docetaxel monotherapy group. However it was higher in PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy group compared with the chemotherapy alone group.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, C., Zhang, S., Xu, D., Liu, R., Zhu, Q., Zhao, Y., … Tian, Y. (2019). Incidence risk of PD-1/PD-L1 related diarrhea in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Management and Research, 11, 3957–3969. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S202756

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free