Comparing construction technologies of single family housing with regard of minimizing embodied energy and embodied carbon

10Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article concerns the Life Cycle Assessment method of evaluation and the ways in which it can be applied as a tool facilitating the design of buildings to reduce embodied energy and embodied carbon. Three variants of a building were examined with the same functional ground plan and usable floor area of 142.6 m2. Each variant of the building was designed using different construction technologies: bricklaying technology utilizing autoclaved aerated concrete popular in Poland, wooden frame insulated with mineral wool, and the Straw-bale technology. Using digital models (Building Information Model) the building's energy characteristics was simulated and the embodied energy and embodied carbon of the production stage (also called cradle-to-gate) were calculated. The performed calculations were used to compare the cumulative energy and embodied carbon of each variant for a 40 year long life cycle.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wȩglarz, A., & Pierzchalski, M. (2018). Comparing construction technologies of single family housing with regard of minimizing embodied energy and embodied carbon. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 49). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184900126

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free