Abstract
This article concerns the Life Cycle Assessment method of evaluation and the ways in which it can be applied as a tool facilitating the design of buildings to reduce embodied energy and embodied carbon. Three variants of a building were examined with the same functional ground plan and usable floor area of 142.6 m2. Each variant of the building was designed using different construction technologies: bricklaying technology utilizing autoclaved aerated concrete popular in Poland, wooden frame insulated with mineral wool, and the Straw-bale technology. Using digital models (Building Information Model) the building's energy characteristics was simulated and the embodied energy and embodied carbon of the production stage (also called cradle-to-gate) were calculated. The performed calculations were used to compare the cumulative energy and embodied carbon of each variant for a 40 year long life cycle.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Wȩglarz, A., & Pierzchalski, M. (2018). Comparing construction technologies of single family housing with regard of minimizing embodied energy and embodied carbon. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 49). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184900126
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.