Hoare type theory, polymorphism and separation

105Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We consider the problem of reconciling a dependently typed functional language with imperative features such as mutable higher-order state, pointer aliasing, and nontermination. We propose Hoare type theory (HTT), which incorporates Hoare-style specifications into types, making it possible to statically track and enforce correct use of side effects. The main feature of HTT is the Hoare type {P}x:A{Q} specifying computations with precondition P and postcondition Q that return a result of type A. Hoare types can be nested, combined with other types, and abstracted, leading to a smooth integration with higher-order functions and type polymorphism. We further show that in the presence of type polymorphism, it becomes possible to interpret the Hoare types in the "small footprint" manner, as advocated by separation logic, whereby specifications tightly describe the state required by the computation. We establish that HTT is sound and compositional, in the sense that separate verifications of individual program components suffice to ensure the correctness of the composite program. © 2008 Cambridge University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nanevski, A., Morrisett, G., & Birkedal, L. (2008). Hoare type theory, polymorphism and separation. In Journal of Functional Programming (Vol. 18, pp. 865–911). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956796808006953

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free