Abstract
We present a dynamic, continuous-time model in which risk averse inside equityholders set a bank’s lending, payout, and financing policies, and the exposure of bank assets to crashes. We examine whether bailouts encourage excessive lending and risk taking compared to liquidation or bail-ins with debt-to-equity conversion or debt write-downs. The effects of the prevailing insolvency resolution mechanism (IRM) on the probability of insolvency, loss in default, and the bank’s value suggest no single IRM is a panacea. We show how a bailout fund financed through a tax on bank dividends resolves bailouts without public money and without distorting insiders’ incentives.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lambrecht, B. M., & Tse, A. S. L. (2023). Liquidation, Bailout, and Bail-In: Insolvency Resolution Mechanisms and Bank Lending. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 58(1), 175–216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109022000813
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.