Misalignment between coronavirus financial aid and public health policies: negative incentives for outpatient clinics in the United States

3Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The United States Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) led to creation of the Paycheck Protection Program, as well as an expansion of reimbursements for telemedicine. CARES Act drafters over emphasized maintaining employment and overlooked negative downstream effects the policies had on outpatient clinics. The misalignment between this financial aid package and public health policy is most apparent in the pressure administrators face to maintain clinic operations, without a transition plan to adopt telemedicine and associated best practices. If this continues, the result will be suboptimal clinical practices and an increased risk of COVID-19 infection to both staff and patients. Particularly in times of crisis, financial aid packages should not be evaluated in isolation; policymakers should consider their implications for public health while designing, enacting, and implementing such measures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, E., & Ko, K. (2021). Misalignment between coronavirus financial aid and public health policies: negative incentives for outpatient clinics in the United States. Journal of Public Health Policy, 42(1), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-020-00256-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free