Validating MCD64A1 and FireCCI51 burned area mapping in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

As an alpine area, surface fires significantly affect the fragile ecosystems of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP). However, no studies on the accuracy of any remote sensing burned area (BA) products on the QTP has not been evaluated, resulting in higher uncertainties in BA mapping. To address this, we used 56-view medium-resolution Landsat images of the QTP from 2001 to 2020 to verify the MCD64A1 and FireCCI51 products by stratified sampling. The results showed that MCD64A1 was more accurate than FireCCI51 for identifying small-scale (<2 km2) BAs within the QTP, whereas FireCCI51 was more accurate for identifying medium-scale (2–5 km2) and large-scale (>5 km2) BAs. Additionally, MCD64A1 was more accurate than FireCCI51 for identifying BAs in forests, FireCCI51 was more accurate than MCD64A1 for identifying BAs in grasslands, shrublands, and wetlands. These results can aid fire risk assessment in the region to improve ecosystem stewardship and inform further improvements in BA products.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huang, Y., Pan, Y., Xia, X., Zhou, Q., Chen, Q., & Zhang, S. (2023). Validating MCD64A1 and FireCCI51 burned area mapping in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Geocarto International, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2023.2285345

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free