Abstract
Background: The extent of pericardiectomy is an important issue in constrictive pericarditis but its impact on long-term outcomes has been rarely reported. We compared long-term results of radical pericardiectomy with conventional phrenic to phrenic pericardiectomy. Methods: Ninety patients who underwent pericardiectomies between February 1995 and April 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. They were classified into conventional (n = 37) and radical (n = 53) groups according to pericardiectomy being performed anterior or posterior to the phrenic nerves, respectively. The follow-up duration at outpatient clinic was 37.6 (11.7, 86.6) months and the survival data until 91.6 (54.5, 147.0) months were obtained. The last echocardiographies were done at 22.4 (4.35, 60.85) months. Results: The early mortality rate was 4.4% (4/90). They all belonged to the conventional group and died of low cardiac output syndrome. The survival rate was higher in the radical group (P =.032, 74.7 ± 9.2% versus 50.4 ± 11.9% in 20 years). NYHA class of both groups had recovered until the last follow-up but the radical group showed better recovery (P
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Choi, M. S., Jeong, D. S., Oh, J. K., Chang, S. A., Park, S. J., & Chung, S. (2019). Long-term results of radical pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis in Korean population. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-019-0845-7
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.