Reduction in TLco and survival in a clinical population

12Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

How best to express the level of lung gas transfer (TLco) function has not been properly explored. We used the most recent clinical data from 13,829 patients (54% male, 10% non-European ancestry), median age 60.5 years (range 20-97), median survival 3.5 years (range 0-20) to determine how best to express TLco function in terms of its relation to survival. The proportion of subjects of non-European ancestry with Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) TLco z-scores above predicted was reduced but was significantly increased between -1.5 to - 3.5 suggesting the need for ethnicity appropriate equations. Applying GLI FVC ethnicity methodology to GLI TLco z-scores removed this ethnic bias and was used for all subsequent analysis. TLco z-scores using the GLI equations were compared with Miller’s US equations with median TLco z-scores being -1.43 and -1.50 for GLI and Miller equations respectively (interquartile range -2.8 to -0.3 and -2.4 to -0.7, respectively). GLI TLco z-scores gave the best Cox regression model for predicting survival. A previously proposed six-tier grading system for level of lung function did not show much separation in survival risk in the less severe grades. A new four-tier grading based on z-scores of -1.645, -3 and -5 showed better separation of risk with hazard ratio for all-cause mortality of 2.0, 3.4 and 6.6 with increasing severity. Using GLI FVC ethnicity methodology to GLI TLco predictions removed ethnic bias and may be the best approach until relevant datasets are available.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miller, M. R., & Cooper, B. G. (2021). Reduction in TLco and survival in a clinical population. European Respiratory Journal, 58(5). https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02046-2020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free