ArticleOPEN ACCESS

Correction to: Anesthetic technique and cancer outcomes: a meta-analysis of total intravenous versus volatile anesthesia (Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, (2019), 66, 5, (546-561), 10.1007/s12630-019-01330-x)

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-019-01381-0
10Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There was an isolated error relating to the Oh et al. study (1) within our recurrence-free survival analysis. When the reported estimates for Oh et al. are corrected, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) is now 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.66 to 1.15; P=0.32.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yap, A., Lopez-Olivo, M. A., Dubowitz, J., Hiller, J., Riedel, B., Wigmore, T., … Buggy, D. (2019, August 15). Correction to: Anesthetic technique and cancer outcomes: a meta-analysis of total intravenous versus volatile anesthesia (Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d’anesthésie, (2019), 66, 5, (546-561), 10.1007/s12630-019-01330-x). Canadian Journal of Anesthesia. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-019-01381-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free