The Power Threat Meaning Framework: An Alternative Nondiagnostic Conceptual System

177Citations
Citations of this article
496Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article summarizes the results of a recently published project to develop a conceptual system incorporating social, psychological, and biological factors as an alternative to functional psychiatric diagnosis. The principles underlying the Power Threat Meaning Framework are briefly described, together with its major features and differences from diagnostic approaches. These include the assumptions that what may be called psychiatric symptoms are understandable responses to often very adverse environments and that these responses, both evolved and socially influenced, serve protective functions and demonstrate human capacity for meaning making and agency. We describe how the elements of the Power Threat Meaning Framework interact to restore links between environmental threats and threat responses, and to enable us to outline some probabilistic Provisional General Patterns, grouped by personal, social, and cultural meaning, describing what people do, not the “disorders” they “have.” We conclude by outlining some implications of the Framework for narrative construction and for thinking about distress across cultures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johnstone, L., & Boyle, M. (2025). The Power Threat Meaning Framework: An Alternative Nondiagnostic Conceptual System. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 65(4), 800–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167818793289

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free