Noise properties of proton density fat fraction estimated using chemical shift–encoded MRI

28Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this work is to characterize the noise distribution of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) measured using chemical shift–encoded MRI, and to provide alternative strategies to reduce bias in PDFF estimation. Theory: We derived the probability density function for PDFF estimated using chemical shift–encoded MRI, and found it to exhibit an asymmetric noise distribution that contributes to signal-to-noise-ratio dependent bias. Methods: To study PDFF noise bias, we performed (at 1.5 T) numerical simulations, phantom acquisitions, and a retrospective in vivo experiment. In each experiment, we compared the performance of three statistics (mean, median, and maximum likelihood estimator) in estimating the PDFF in a region of interest. Results: We demonstrated the presence of the asymmetric noise distribution in simulations, phantoms, and in vivo. In each experiment we demonstrated that both the median and proposed maximum likelihood estimator statistics outperformed the mean statistic in mitigating noise-related bias for low signal-to-noise-ratio acquisitions. Conclusions: Characterization of the noise distribution of PDFF estimated using chemical shift–encoded MRI enabled new strategies based on median and maximum likelihood estimator statistics to mitigate noise-related bias for accurate PDFF measurement from a region of interest. Such strategies are important for quantitative chemical shift–encoded MRI applications that typically operate in low signal-to-noise-ratio regimes. Magn Reson Med 80:685–695, 2018. © 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roberts, N. T., Hernando, D., Holmes, J. H., Wiens, C. N., & Reeder, S. B. (2018). Noise properties of proton density fat fraction estimated using chemical shift–encoded MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 80(2), 685–695. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27065

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free