This article analyzes Myanmar’s transition from authoritarianism and asks if it represents a transition towards democracy or a hybrid form of rule. Starting from theoretical debates about modes of transition, the article examines competing discourses on Myanmar’s opening and argues that it resembles an imposed more than a negotiated transition. Next, the article analyzes the links between this mode of transition and its outcomes, and finds that contemporary Myanmar is characterized by a combination of formal institutions for democratic representation, civilian government, and power-sharing, and problems of weak popular representation, limited civilian control of the military, and continued centralization of state authority. The article concludes that Myanmar’s political trajectory remains open-ended, but also that Myanmar, at least for the time being, seems more accurately described as a relatively stable hybrid regime than as a country that is in transition to democracy.
CITATION STYLE
Stokke, K., & Aung, S. M. (2020). Transition to Democracy or Hybrid Regime? The Dynamics and Outcomes of Democratization in Myanmar. European Journal of Development Research, 32(2), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-019-00247-x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.