Walking Borders, Risk and Belonging

  • O’Neill M
  • Einashe I
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Walking borders, risk & belonging makes a case for using walking as a biographical interviewmethod (WIBM) in order to do critical public pedagogy—using conjunctural analysis—that engagesin unsettling and troubling the white, male privilege and basis of walking, and indeed the‘turn’ to walking rooted in Eurocentric practices. The authors build upon a long history of: i) usingwalking, participatory and arts-based methods (ethno-mimesis) to do social research on migrationwith migrants, and; ii) the importance of creating space for stories of asylum, migration andmarginalisation to be shared and heard through critical pedagogy, critical journalism, and walkingas an arts-based research method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Neill, M., & Einashe, I. (2019). Walking Borders, Risk and Belonging. Journal of Public Pedagogies, (4). https://doi.org/10.15209/jpp.1173

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free