Abstract
In monocular vision, the horizontal/vertical aspect ratio (shape) of a frontoparallel rectangle can be based on the comparison of the perceived directions of the rectangle's edges. In binocular vision of a typical three-dimensional scene (when occlusions are present), this is not the case: Frontoparallel rectangles would be perceived in a distorted fashion if an observer were to base perceived aspect ratio on the perceived directions of the rectangle's edges. We psychophysically investigated stereoscopically perceived aspect ratios of frontoparallel occluding and occluded rectangles for various distances and fixation depths. We found that observers did not perceive the distortions that would be predicted on the basis of the above-mentioned comparison of the perceived visual directions of the edges of the rectangle. Our results strongly suggest that the mechanism that determines perceived aspect ratio is dissociated from the mechanism that determines perceived direction. The consequences of the findings for the Kanizsa, Poggendorff, and horizontal/vertical illusions are discussed.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Van Ee, R., & Erkelens, C. J. (2000). Is there an interaction between perceived direction and perceived aspect ratio in stereoscopic vision? Perception and Psychophysics, 62(5), 910–926. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212077
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.