Detection of cervical metastases with 11C-tyrosine pet in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx: A comparison with 18F-FDG PET

12Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background. A disadvantage of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in head and neck cancer is that 18F-FDG uptake is not specific to malignant tissue. To provide an alternative, radiolabeled amino acids such as L-1-[ 11C]-tyrosine (11C-TYR), were introduced because these are less avidly metabolized by inflammatory cells. Methods. In this prospective study, we compared both 11C-TYR PET and 18F-FDG PET performance in detecting cervical metastases in 27 patients with a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of oral cavity or oropharynx. Results. 11C-TYR PET sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting nodal metastases were 33%, 100%, and 81%, respectively. With respect to 18F-FDG PET, these figures were 67%, 97%, and 89%, respectively. Neck metastases not detected by 11C-TYR PET were camouflaged by high tracer uptake by salivary glands. Conclusions. Because of bilateral accumulation of 11C-TYR in salivary glands, 11C-TYR PET is not suitable to replace 18F-FDG PET in staging SCC of oral cavity and oropharynx. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krabbe, C. A., Van Der Werff-Regelink, G., Pruim, J., Van Der Wal, J. E., & Roodenburg, J. L. N. (2010). Detection of cervical metastases with 11C-tyrosine pet in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx: A comparison with 18F-FDG PET. Head and Neck, 32(3), 368–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21192

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free