The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge

2.0kCitations
Citations of this article
1.5kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Concepts are the elementary units of reason and linguistic meaning. They are conventional and relatively stable. As such, they must somehow be the result of neural activity in the brain. The questions are: Where? and How? A common philosophical position is that all concepts - even concepts about action and perception - are symbolic and abstract, and therefore must be implemented outside the brain's sensory-motor system. We will argue against this position using (1) neuroscientific evidence; (2) results from neural computation; and (3) results about the nature of concepts from cognitive linguistics. We will propose that the sensory-motor system has the right kind of structure to characterise both sensory-motor and more abstract concepts. Central to this picture are the neural theory of language and the theory of cogs, according to which, brain structures in the sensory-motor regions are exploited to characterise the so-called "abstract" concepts that constitute the meanings of grammatical constructions and general inference patterns. © 2005 Psychology Press Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005, May). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000310

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free