Exploring return to work barriers through the lens of model of human occupation. The NOW WHAT project

7Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The challenges of returning to work after sickness absence demands a wide conceptual understanding of what hinders the employee’s work participation. Thus, there is a need to know more about self-perceived barriers for Return to Work (RTW). Aim: This study aimed to investigate RTW barriers experienced by employees on long-term sick leave, through the lens of the Model of Human Occupation (MOHO). Material and methods: The study was a large-scale qualitative interview study (n = 85) using semi-structured telephone interviews. Eligible participants had received sick leave benefits for between 6 months and 1.5 years. The data were analysed with quantitative and qualitative content analysis. A deductive approach using the MOHO concepts guided the analysis process. Results: The study generated 941 coded meaning units describing barriers for RTW, of which we were able to code 895 within the framework of MOHO. In the person-specific concepts, performance capacity barriers were most often described (n = 303), followed by volitional barriers (n = 165) and barriers related to habituation (n = 66). Barriers related to the environmental components amounted to 361. Barriers in the occupational environment was dominant (n = 214). Conclusion: Experienced barriers related to both environmental components and person-specific concepts. Significance: The habituational and volitional perspective on barriers can contribute to the identification and communication of performance capacity-related barriers not previously identified.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Strømstad, K., Skarpaas, L. S., Haslerud, S. I., Alve, Y. A., Sandqvist, J., & Aas, R. W. (2024). Exploring return to work barriers through the lens of model of human occupation. The NOW WHAT project. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2023.2297732

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free