Clinical relevance of symptomatic superficial-vein thrombosis extension: Lessons from the CALISTO study

38Citations
Citations of this article
81Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The clinical relevance of symptomatic extension of spontaneous, acute, symptomatic, lower-limb superficial-vein thrombosis (SVT) is debated. We performed a post hoc analysis of a double-blind trial comparing fondaparinux with placebo. The main study outcome was SVT extension by day 77, whether to ≤3 cmor >3 cm from the sapheno-femoral junction (SFJ). All events were objectively confirmed and validated by an adjudication committee. With placebo (n 5 1500), symptomatic SVT extension to ≤3cmor >3 cmfrom the SFJ occurred in 54 (3.6%) and 56 (3.7%) patients, respectively, inducing comparable medical resource consumption (eg, anticoagulant drugs and SFJ ligation); subsequent deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism occurred in 9.3% (5/54) and 8.9% (5/56) of patients, respectively. Fondaparinux was associated with lower incidences of SVT extension to ≤3 cm(0.3%; 5/1502; P 3 cm (0.8%; 12/1502; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leizorovicz, A., Becker, F., Buchmul̈ler, A., Queŕé, I., Prandoni, P., & Decousus, H. (2013). Clinical relevance of symptomatic superficial-vein thrombosis extension: Lessons from the CALISTO study. Blood, 122(10), 1724–1729. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-04-498014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free