Feeling Guilty Being a c(ai)borg: Navigating the Tensions Between Guilt and Empowerment in AI Use

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper explores the emotional, ethical and practical dimensions of integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into personal and professional workflows, focusing on the concept of feeling guilty as a’c(ai)borg’ - a human augmented by AI. Inspired by Donna Haraway’s Cyborg Manifesto, the study explores how AI challenges traditional notions of creativity, originality and intellectual labour. Using an autoethnographic approach, the authors reflect on their year-long experiences with AI tools, revealing a transition from initial guilt and reluctance to empowerment through skill-building and transparency. Key findings highlight the importance of basic academic skills, advanced AI literacy and honest engagement with AI results. The c(ai)borg vision advocates for a future where AI is openly embraced as a collaborative partner, fostering innovation and equity while addressing issues of access and agency. By reframing guilt as growth, the paper calls for a thoughtful and inclusive approach to AI integration.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aal, K., Aal, T., Navumau, V., Unbehaun, D., Müller, C., Wulf, V., & Rüller, S. (2025). Feeling Guilty Being a c(ai)borg: Navigating the Tensions Between Guilt and Empowerment in AI Use. In Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (Vol. 408, pp. 94–107). IOS Press BV. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA250629

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free