Evaluation of the survival prediction index as a model of risk stratification for clinical research in dogs admitted to intensive care units at four locations

71Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To prospectively evaluate a survival prediction index (SPI) in dogs admitted to intensive care units (ICU) and to generate and test an improved SPI de, SPI2). Sample Population: Medical records of 624 critically ill dogs admitted to an ICU. Procedure: Data were collected from dogs within 24 hours after admission to an ICU. Variables recorded reflected function of vital organ systems, seventy of underlying physiologic derangement, and extent of physiologic reserve; outcome was defined as dogs that survived or did not survive until 30 days after admission to the ICU. Probabilities of survival were calculated, using an established model (SPI). We then performed another logistic regression analysis, thereby reestimating the variables to create the new SPI2. Cross-validation of the models obtained was performed by randomly assigning the total sample of 624 dogs into an estimation group of 499 dogs and validation group of 125 dogs. Results: Testing of SPI resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.723. Testing of SPI2 revealed an AUC of 0.773. A backwards-elimination procedure was used to create a model containing fewer variables, and variables were sequentially eliminated. The AUC for the reduced model of SPI2 was 0.76, indicating little loss in predictive accuracy. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: The new SPI2 objectively stratified clinical patients into groups according to severity of disease. This index could provide an important tool for clinical research. (Am J Vet Res 2001;62:948-954).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

King, L. G., Wohl, J. S., Manning, A. M., Hackner, S. G., Raffe, M. R., & Maislin, G. (2001). Evaluation of the survival prediction index as a model of risk stratification for clinical research in dogs admitted to intensive care units at four locations. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 62(6), 948–954. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.948

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free