The transition to consultant: Identifying gaps in higher specialist training

5Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: New consultants consistently feel better prepared for the clinical rather than non-clinical aspects of their role. However, deficiencies in generic competencies have been linked to burnout and patient complaints. This study explored how higher specialty training prepares doctors for the transition to consultant in genitourinary medicine. Results: New consultants felt less prepared for non-clinical aspects of their role. Prior practical experience was the greatest influencing factor in levels of preparedness, with increased responsibility and leadership driving deeper learning. Observation of others helped individuals develop a professional identity but also learn about the wider processes within their service. The learning environment positively influenced preparedness but highlighted a need for dedicated time to learn non-clinical aspects. Conclusion: To ensure future trainees feel prepared for the non-clinical aspects of the consultant role, practical experience of nonclinical areas with high levels of leadership and responsibility within a supportive learning environment is essential.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flavell, S., Robinson, A., & Dacre, J. (2020). The transition to consultant: Identifying gaps in higher specialist training. Clinical Medicine, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 20(4), 406–411. https://doi.org/10.7861/CLINMED.2020-0085

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free