Intergenerational influences affecting birth outcome. II. Preterm delivery and gestational age in the children of the 1958 British birth cohort

22Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The 1958 British cohort study has data to investigate intergenerational effects on preterm delivery and on gestational age in non-preterm births, allowing for many confounders that may differ in the more pathological preterm babies. Previous results for all gestational ages have been inconsistent. The strongest and only likely independent intergenerational effect on non-preterm gestational age found is parental gestational age (adjusted regression coefficient = 0.067 weeks per week in mothers and 0.045 in fathers). The preterm analysis has low power; however, reported history of hypertension in mothers (any), in fathers and in the maternal grandmother (measured in the 1958 pregnancy) all significantly and independently increased the risk of preterm birth [OR = 1.7, 2.0, 1.5 respectively]. The absolute risk was particularly high in hypertensive mothers who had been preterm themselves (21%). Other possible intergenerational influences of height, weight, fetal growth and gestation were not significant enough and/or consistent enough between parents to speculate whether they are truly intergenerational or confounded by other factors acting during the pregnancy. Excepting mother's weight for height, no genetic or environmental influence studied affects both gestational age and fetal growth in term births. However, many maternal factors that reduce either fetal growth or gestation in term births are associated with increased risk of preterm birth. © 1998 Blackwell Science Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hennessy, E., & Alberman, E. (1998). Intergenerational influences affecting birth outcome. II. Preterm delivery and gestational age in the children of the 1958 British birth cohort. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 12(SUPPL. 1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3016.1998.0120s1061.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free