Comparative physical and mechanical properties of a 3D printed temporary crown and bridge restorative material

16Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The objective was to compare physic-mechanical properties of different materials used for temporary restorations. Material and Methods. Protemp 4/bisacrylic resin, Jet/acrylic resin, and Nexdent C&B/3D-printed resin samples (10mm diameter x 2mm thickness) were analyzed for surface roughness and color stability tests (baseline, after 5 thousand brushing cycles; and after artificial aging in water at 60oC for 24 hours) and Knoop microhardness. All data were checked for normality using Shapiro-Wilk test. Surface roughness and color stability were analyzed using two-way repeated measurements ANOVA, microhardness data was subjected to one-way ANOVA. All tests were followed by Tukey test and were performed with α=0.05. Results. For roughness, material (p=.002), time points (p=.002) and interaction between both (p <0.001) were significant. All groups showed similar color variation before and after artificial aging. There was an increase in color alteration after artificial aging for all groups. Considering microhardness test (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rizzante, F., Bueno, T., Guimarães, G., Moura, G., Teich, S., Furuse, A., & Mendonça, G. (2023). Comparative physical and mechanical properties of a 3D printed temporary crown and bridge restorative material. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 15(6), e464–e469. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.60507

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free