Abstract
Background: The objective was to compare physic-mechanical properties of different materials used for temporary restorations. Material and Methods. Protemp 4/bisacrylic resin, Jet/acrylic resin, and Nexdent C&B/3D-printed resin samples (10mm diameter x 2mm thickness) were analyzed for surface roughness and color stability tests (baseline, after 5 thousand brushing cycles; and after artificial aging in water at 60oC for 24 hours) and Knoop microhardness. All data were checked for normality using Shapiro-Wilk test. Surface roughness and color stability were analyzed using two-way repeated measurements ANOVA, microhardness data was subjected to one-way ANOVA. All tests were followed by Tukey test and were performed with α=0.05. Results. For roughness, material (p=.002), time points (p=.002) and interaction between both (p <0.001) were significant. All groups showed similar color variation before and after artificial aging. There was an increase in color alteration after artificial aging for all groups. Considering microhardness test (p
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Rizzante, F., Bueno, T., Guimarães, G., Moura, G., Teich, S., Furuse, A., & Mendonça, G. (2023). Comparative physical and mechanical properties of a 3D printed temporary crown and bridge restorative material. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 15(6), e464–e469. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.60507
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.