AAPM task group report 305: Guidance for standardization of vendor-neutral reject analysis in radiography

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Reject rate analysis is considered an integral part of a diagnostic radiography quality control (QC) program. A rejected image is a patient radiograph that was not presented to a radiologist for diagnosis and that contributes unnecessary radiation dose to the patient. Reject rates that are either too high or too low may suggest systemic department shortcomings in QC mechanisms. Due to the lack of standardization, reject data often cannot be easily compared between radiography systems from different vendors. The purpose of this report is to provide guidance to help standardize data elements that are required for comprehensive reject analysis and to propose data reporting and workflows to enable an effective and comprehensive reject rate monitoring program. Essential data elements, a proposed schema for classifying reject reasons, and workflow implementation options are recommended in this task group report.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Little, K., Reiser, I., Apgar, B., Dalal, P., Dave, J., Fisher, R., … Zhang, J. (2023). AAPM task group report 305: Guidance for standardization of vendor-neutral reject analysis in radiography. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 24(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13938

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free