Bleeding time: Is it a useful clinical tool?

38Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The bleeding times of five volunteers were assessed individually by each of 12 observers. The reliability of the measurements obtained was examined by comparing statistically the variability between subjects and between observers. This variability was found to be similar for both groups. Consequently, we suggest that the bleeding time estimation is an unreliable test and should not be used in isolation without reference to the salient features of a history and examination, when determining if an individual patient is at risk of haematoma formation as a complication of regional anaesthetic techniques. © 1992 British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’kelly, S. W., Lawes, E. G., & Luntley, J. B. (1992). Bleeding time: Is it a useful clinical tool? British Journal of Anaesthesia, 68(3), 313–315. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/68.3.313

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free