Bedside prediction of the progress of pressure ulcer healing in patients with spinal cord injury using the 'Decu-stick'

2Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Study design:This is a prospective cohort study.Objectives:The objective of this study was to predict the progress of healing of pressure ulcers (PUs) in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients after the first 4 weeks.Setting:The study was conducted in a specialized SCI rehabilitation unit in The Netherlands.Methods:Weekly measurements of length, width and depth/undermining of grades II-IV PUs under sacrum or ischial tuberosity in SCI patients with the 'Decu-stick' were taken. The speed of reduction of the greatest dimension in the first 4 weeks of the granulation-epithelization (G-E) phase was compared with the speed of reduction of this dimension after week 4 until the end of observation.Results:Fifty-one PUs in 45 patients were measured. During the first 4 weeks of the G-E phase, the greatest dimension of 23/51 PUs reduced with a speed of ≥0.5 cm per week. In 22 of these 23 PUs, this speed remained ≥0.5 from week 4 until the end of observation (weeks 5-22). Closure: 21 patients (pts); operation: 2 pts. Of 28/51 PUs, this dimension reduced with <0.5 cm per week. In 27/28 PUs, this speed remained <0.5 from week 4 until the end of observation (weeks 9-37). Closure: 6 pts; operation: 16 pts; discharge with open ulcer: 6 pts.Conclusion:Measurement of PUs in SCI patients with the 'Decu-stick' provides a reliable, quick, cheap and easy-to-learn bedside method to predict the progress of healing in PUs in SCI patients after 4 weeks of conservative treatment with a positive predictive value of 0.95 and an negative predictive value of 0.96. This provides a scientific basis for the decision on operative or alternative conservative treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Asbeck, F. W. A., & Post, M. W. M. (2015). Bedside prediction of the progress of pressure ulcer healing in patients with spinal cord injury using the “Decu-stick.” Spinal Cord, 53(7), 539–543. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2015.40

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free