The cognitive structure underlying the organization of observed actions

11Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In daily life, we frequently encounter actions performed by other people. Here we aimed to examine the key categories and features underlying the organization of a wide range of actions in three behavioral experiments (N = 378 participants). In Experiment 1, we used a multi-arrangement task of 100 different actions. Inverse multidimensional scaling and hierarchical clustering revealed 11 action categories, including Locomotion, Communication, and Aggressive actions. In Experiment 2, we used a feature-listing paradigm to obtain a wide range of action features that were subsequently reduced to 59 key features and used in a rating study (Experiment 3). A direct comparison of the feature ratings obtained in Experiment 3 between actions belonging to the categories identified in Experiment 1 revealed a number of features that appear to be critical for the distinction between these categories, e.g., the features Harm and Noise for the category Aggressive actions, and the features Targeting a person and Contact with others for the category Interaction. Finally, we found that a part of the category-based organization is explained by a combination of weighted features, whereas a significant proportion of variability remained unexplained, suggesting that there are additional sources of information that contribute to the categorization of observed actions. The characterization of action categories and their associated features serves as an important extension of previous studies examining the cognitive structure of actions. Moreover, our results may serve as the basis for future behavioral, neuroimaging and computational modeling studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kabulska, Z., & Lingnau, A. (2023). The cognitive structure underlying the organization of observed actions. Behavior Research Methods, 55(4), 1890–1906. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01894-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free