Abstract
The aim of the study was to demonstrate the superiority of docetaxel and epirubicin vs docetaxel alone as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with adjuvant or neoadjuvant epirubicin. We compared single agent docetaxel 100 mg m-2 (D) with the combination of docetaxel 80 mg m-2 and epirubicin 75 mg m-2 (ED). The response rate (72 vs 79%), the progression-free survival (median 9 vs 11 months) and the overall survival (median 18 vs 21 months) were not significantly different between the ED (n = 26) and D arms (n = 25), respectively. Leucopaenia, nausea and stomatitis were significantly worse with ED. In conclusion, epirubicin should not be administered in combination with taxanes in metastatic breast cancer patients relapsed after an anthracycline-based adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. © 2006 Cancer Research.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Pacilio, C., Morabito, A., Nuzzo, F., Gravina, A., Labonia, V., Landi, G., … De Matteis, A. (2006). Is epirubicin effective in first-line chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after an epirubicin-containing adjuvant treatment? A single centre phase III trial. British Journal of Cancer, 94(9), 1233–1236. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603096
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.