Instrumentalization of “China” in Southeast Asia’s global entrepôt: Ayutthaya in the times of the ming and the early qing dynasties

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article analyzes the instrumentalization of “China” in contacts between the Ming and Qing dynasties and Siam-Ayutthaya. It focuses both on the state-to-state relations and those between various members of the Siamese and the imperial societies. “China” and “Chinese-ness” stood for forms of ascribed identity within the Sinocentric world, for a form of social distinction, and for one of many identities assumed in the games of political loyalty. For the Ming and Qing empires, inclusion of a foreign land within “China” was conducted through the ritual and administrative fictions that situated Ayutthaya within a hierarchy vis-à-vis the imperial capital. Beyond the state’s discourses, participation in a vaguely defined Chinese culture were means of building social networks within the merchant and official communities in Ayutthaya. For the junkmen that connected Ayutthaya and South China, multiple Chinese identities were instrumentalized and inflected according to the needs and necessities of the moment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chabrowski, I. I. (2022). Instrumentalization of “China” in Southeast Asia’s global entrepôt: Ayutthaya in the times of the ming and the early qing dynasties. Journal of Chinese History, 6(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/jch.2021.37

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free