Clinical trial: Comparison of ibuprofen-phosphatidylcholine and ibuprofen on the gastrointestinal safety and analgesic efficacy in osteoarthritic patients

62Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Background: Chronic use of NSAIDs is associated with gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity that increases with age. Aim: To evaluate the GI safety and therapeutic efficacy of ibuprofen chemically associated with phosphatidylcholine (PC) in osteoarthritic (OA) patients. Methods: A randomized, double-blind trial of 125 patients was performed. A dose of 2400 mg/day of ibuprofen or an equivalent dose of ibuprofen-PC was administered for 6 weeks. GI safety was assessed by endoscopy. Efficacy was assessed by scores of analgesia and anti-inflammatory activity. Bioavailability of ibuprofen was pharmacokinetically assessed. Results: Ibuprofen-PC and ibuprofen provided similar bioavailability/therapeutic efficacy. In the evaluable subjects, a trend for improved GI safety in the ibuprofen-PC group compared with ibuprofen that did not reach statistical significance was observed. However, in patients aged >55 years, a statistically significant advantage for ibuprofen-PC treatment vs. ibuprofen in the prevention of NSAID-induced gut injury was observed with increases in both mean Lanza scores and the risk of developing >2 erosions or an ulcer. Ibuprofen-PC was well tolerated with no major adverse events observed. Conclusion: Ibuprofen-PC is an effective osteoarthritic agent with an improved GI safety profile compared with ibuprofen in older OA patients, who are most susceptible to NSAID-induced gastroduodenal injury. © 2008 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lanza, F. L., Marathi, U. K., Anand, B. S., & Lichtenberger, L. M. (2008). Clinical trial: Comparison of ibuprofen-phosphatidylcholine and ibuprofen on the gastrointestinal safety and analgesic efficacy in osteoarthritic patients. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 28(4), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03765.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free