Prevalence of ventilation blockages in patients affected by attic pathology: A case-control study

29Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis Using a retrospective video evaluation of exclusive endoscopic middle ear procedures, we analyzed the different anatomical and pathological findings between patients with attic disease or cholesteatoma and patients without attic disease. Study Design A case-control study based on a retrospective chart review in a tertiary university referral center. Methods Videos from endoscopic middle ear procedures carried out between February 2007 and August 2012 were reviewed. We analyzed and compared two groups of patients who underwent surgery in our university hospital: patients with selective attic disease (e.g., non-self-cleaning attic selective retraction pockets or attic cholesteatoma) were compared with subjects without attic disease (e.g., chronic middle ear disease, congenital cholesteatoma, or secondary cholesteatoma). Results In total, 152 patients were included in the study. Of these, 102 were affected by primary acquired cholesteatoma (84/102) or severe pars flaccida retraction pockets (18/102), whereas 50 cases were controls. A blockage of the isthmus was present in almost all cases (98/102) compared with a lower prevalence in controls (3/50) (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marchioni, D., Mattioli, F., Alicandri-Ciufelli, M., & Presutti, L. (2013). Prevalence of ventilation blockages in patients affected by attic pathology: A case-control study. Laryngoscope, 123(11), 2845–2853. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24165

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free