Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of venous ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

13Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Considering the substantial impact of venous ulcers on quality of life and healthcare systems, this study evaluated the efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in comparison to conventional therapy. A systematic review of four databases identified 16 randomized clinical trials, including 20 study groups. PRP significantly enhanced complete ulcer healing, exhibiting an odds ratio (OR) of 5.06 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.35–10.89), and increased the percentage of healed ulcer area by a mean difference of 47% (95% CI: 32%–62%). Additionally, PRP shortened the time required for complete healing by an average of 3.25 months (95% CI: −4.06 to −2.43). Although pain reduction was similar in both groups, PRP considerably decreased ulcer recurrence rates (OR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.05–0.50) without increasing the risks of infection or irritative dermatitis. These results suggest PRP as a viable, safe alternative for venous ulcer treatment, providing significant improvements in healing outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hu, Z., Wang, S., Yang, H., Xv, H., Shan, B., Lin, L., & Han, X. (2024, February 1). Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of venous ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Wound Journal. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14736

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free