Whataboutisms: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

15Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The rhetorical function of whataboutism is to redirect attention from the specific case at hand. Alt-hough commonly used as a rhetorical move, whataboutisms can appear in arguments. These tend to be weak arguments and are often instances of the tu quoque fallacy or other fallacies of relevance. In what follows, I show that arguments involving a whataboutist move can take a wide variety of forms, and in some cases, they can occur in good arguments. I end by considering how whataboutist arguing in social justice contexts can be harmful to arguers and to the audiences for their arguments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bowell, T. (2023). Whataboutisms: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Informal Logic, 43(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.22329/IL.V43I1.7304

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free