Case Report of Angular Post-Tuberculotic Kyphosis Corrected Through Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Above C7

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Angular cervical kyphosis and its association with syringomyelia were rarely described. Correcting this kind of deformity from the front is extremely difficult or even impossible. Meanwhile, no study has made a report about correcting angular cervical kyphosis through pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) above C7 because of the special anatomy of the vertebral artery. This is the first case of cervical deformity correction through PSO above C7. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 52-yr-old man who previously underwent debridement, decompression, and skull traction for cervical tuberculosis at age 6 yr. The sequelae of right-hand weakness occurred after surgery, and cervical kyphosis formed gradually. The patient recently started to complain of a severe neck pain. X-rays showed a cervical sagittal malalignment due to the angular kyphosis. Computed tomography scans revealed a fused angular kyphosis at C6-7, and MRI showed a long syringomyelia distal to the kyphosis. The definite diagnosis of the patient was posttuberculotic cervical angular kyphosis, and because of the extremely narrow surgery corridor from the front, we decided to perform the surgery in a posterior approach. Hence, the patient was treated with the PSO with a long-segment pedicle screw fixation from C3 to T5 and received satisfactory angular kyphosis correction. CONCLUSION: PSO above C7 to correct angular cervical kyphosis is feasible and reasonable when there is no other better solution, and it can achieve a satisfactory kyphotic deformity correction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ma, S., Yu, H., Zhou, Z., Wu, C., Liu, Z., Deng, W., & Cao, K. (2022). Case Report of Angular Post-Tuberculotic Kyphosis Corrected Through Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Above C7. Operative Neurosurgery, 22(1), E53–E57. https://doi.org/10.1227/ONS.0000000000000026

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free