Safety-by-design and engineered nanomaterials: the need to move from theory to practice

19Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

As the governance of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) evolves, innovations in the prevention, mitigation, management, and transfer of risk shape discussion of how nanotechnology may mature and reach various marketplaces. Safety-by-Design (SbD) is one leading concept that, while equally philosophy as well as risk-based practice, can uniquely help address lingering uncertainties and concerns stemming from regulatory evaluation of ENM risk across worker, consumer, and environmental safety. This paper provides a discussion on the SbD concept across different disciplines aiming to identify different approaches and needs to meet regulatory requirements—ultimately, we argue that SbD is evolving both to meet the needs and discourse of various disciplines, and to apply within differing marketplaces and national regulatory structures. Understanding how SbD has evolved within ENM can yield a more practical application and development of SbD, and help guide or unify national and international ENM governance around a core set of safety-driven principles.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trump, B. D., Antunes, D., Palma-Oliveira, J., Nelson, A., Hudecova, A. M., Rundén-Pran, E., … Linkov, I. (2024). Safety-by-design and engineered nanomaterials: the need to move from theory to practice. Environment Systems and Decisions, 44(1), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-023-09927-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free