Comparative accuracy of population estimators for enclosed small mammal populations

  • Peterjohn W
  • Patterson J
  • Barrett G
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

, 1981: Comparative accuracy of population estimators for enclosed small mammal populations. Acta theriol., 26, 31: 459-468 [With 1 Table]. Density estimates for populations of Mus musculus and Microtus pennsylvanicus of known size were obtained from three perturbation studies conducted on enclosed grassland and old-field communities. The comparative accuracy of Jolly's stochastic method, a modified Schnabel census, Overton's method, the

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peterjohn, W. T., Patterson, J. L., Barrett, G. W., & Farrell, M. P. (1981). Comparative accuracy of population estimators for enclosed small mammal populations. Acta Theriologica, 26, 459–468. https://doi.org/10.4098/at.arch.81-40

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free