Abstract
Phenotypic plasticity enables organisms to produce better-suited phenotypes when the environment changes, improving fitness under adverse conditions. Yet responding to environmental cues may provide little use in a constant environment, where organisms already express optimal phenotypes. The forces that sustain plasticity and account for its widespread presence, thus, remain unclear, as plasticity must remain advantageous to persist. Although typically associated with changing environments, maintenance of plasticity requires generational turnover such that parents and offspring regularly encounter different conditions. Here, we demonstrate that even a low number of migrants between locally adapted populations, in constant environments, can promote the emergence and persistence of phenotypic plasticity even when plasticity is costly and never associated with the fittest genotype, independent of its genetic architecture. We support this conclusion by exploring the parameter space of a two-locus, two-deme model using stochastic simulations and analytical approximations. We derive analytical conditions under which plasticity is adaptively maintained as a function of selection strength, migration, and fitness trade-offs. These findings reveal new potential evolutionary origins of plasticity and offer insight into how maladaptive traits can invade adapted populations in stable environments.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Gulisija, D., & Newberry, M. (2026). Evolution of phenotypic plasticity owing to migration. Evolution Letters, 10(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/evlett/qraf040
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.